The is a judgment of Court nº 3 in Maspalomas. His Lordship has declared null and void the two contracts my clients have signed with Anfi, both 2013, granting them with the return of the monies paid less the deduction set by the Supreme Court. So, in the first contract, from a total of 9.270,00 the amount to be returned is left in 8,713.80, whereas in the second goes from 17,100.00 to 16,074.00.Read More
This judgment was issued by Court No. 3 of Granadilla de Abona and it declares the nullity of the contracts signed by my clients with the developers and management companies of the "Fairways Club" …Read More
It is a judgment of the Court of First Instance No. 1 of Maspalomas. This Court, together with No. 5, are the only two who are not holding Trials because they do not consider the interrogation of my clients necessary, so they issue a judgment directly after the Preliminary Hearing ("Audiencia Previa")Read More
This is a Court of First Instance judgement. It was issued last year, in June. Now is on appeal by Anfi. This second stage may take another year and a half or even two, depending very much in which Court of Appeals and Room deals with the case.Read More
On this occasion, Room 4 of the Court of Appeals upheld the sentence issued by Court No. 4 of San Bartolomé that had already declared the contract null and void, in this case condemning Puerto Calma Marketing and Vista Amadores to pay to my clients the sum of 24,439.42 euros.Read More
In this judgment the Court of Appeal has declared the contracts null and void, ordering Silverpoint Vacations to return the sum of £ 52,550.35 plus another £ 88,960 in concept of money unduly anticipated. In addition, the judgement, as can be seen in the yellow highlighted ...Read More
This ruling was issued in 2016 by the Court of First Instance No. 5 of Arona. The contract was declared null and void because it exceeded the legal maximum allowed for 50 years, consequently Silverpoint Vacations, S.L. was sentenced to return to my clients the sum of 13,164 pounds, plus interest and court costs.Read More
Today I’ve checked again how many sentences of the Supreme Court are about Timeshare. Currently there are, at least, 105, from which 42 belong to Silverpoint, 37 to Anfi, 8 to Palm Oasis and 6 to Puerto Calma plus a few others. Impressive, all this since 2015...
Now you know more about timeshare contracts in Spain, so if you want to get rid of it I am an independent lawyer and I can help you! Remember that preliminary advice is for free, Why not give it a try here?
In general terms what the Supreme Court has ruled is that:
a) Undetermined object. Timeshare contracts must have a clearly determined and described object, according to the mandatory requirements set in the law. This is why floating or even apartments describes as "T1-2Bed", etc, are ilegal...
b) Indefinite period of time. It is not only that perpetuity contracts are null and void, any contractRead More
Very interesting article that I read here and reproduce below for an easier reading:
"During the holiday season, you can see several advertisements that are based on the psychology of time pressured sales and the “fear of missing out” or ‘FOMO’ mentality. Phrases like “act now” and “limited time offer” are frequently used in advertising to prompt consumers to reduce speculation about the purchase, and pull the trigger to make a positive purchase decision.Read More